 |
 |
Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011
ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 2012,
344 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert €
50,–
Warren B. MillerS. 19 - 29 doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s19Published Online:
2012/02/02 14:36:44 Object Identifier:
0xc1aa500d 0x002a70ee
Introduction
Maria Rita Testa, Tomás Sobotka and Philip S. Morgan: Reproductive decision-making: towards improved theoretical,
methodological and empirical approaches.
Demographic Debate
S. Philip Morgan and Christine A. Bachrach: Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human
fertility?
Warren B. Miller: Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework
Jennifer Barber: The Theory of Planned Behaviour: considering drives, proximity and
dynamics
Dimiter Philipov: Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer's perspective
Jane Klobas: The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility
decisions
Aart C. Liefbroer: On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility
research
Icek Ajzen: Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique
Christine A. Bachrach and S. Philip Morgan: Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility
research
Refereed Articles
Warren B. Miller: Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory,
research and policy
Máire Ní Bhrolcháin and Éva Beaujouan: Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007
Saskia Hin, Anne Gauthier, Joshua Goldstein and Christoph Bühler: Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us
Maria Rita Testa, Laura Cavalli and Alessandro Rosina: Couple´s childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading
it?
Nicoletta Balbo and Melinda Mills: The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility
intentions
Markus Kotte and Volker Ludwig: Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion
David De Wachter and Karel Neels: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family
formation in Flanders in the early 1990s
Clémentine Rossier, Sara Brachet and Anne Salles: Family policies, norms about gender roles and fertility decisions in France
and Germany
Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen and Markus Jokela: Baby longing and men's reproductive motivation
Anna Baranowska and Anna Matysiak: Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland
Data and Trends (non-refereed contributions)
Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki and Heather Gatny : Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended
pregnancies
Beatrice Chromková Manea and Petr Fucík: Couples disagreement about fertility preferences and family-friendly policy
measures in the Czech Republic
|
|
|
REFERENCES |
|
|
Ajzen, I. 2010. Fertility intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Paper presented at the conference “From intentions to behavior: reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective“. Vienna, Austria. 2-3 December 2010. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/in2b/
|
|
|
Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein 2008. Scaling and testing multiplicative combinations in the expectancy-value model of attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(9): 2222-2247.
|
|
|
Albarracin, D., B.T. Johnson, M. Fishbein and P.A. Muellerleile 2001. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 127(1): 142-161.
|
|
|
Bachrach, C.A. and S. Newcomer 1999. Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 251-252.
|
|
|
Bargh, J.A. and E. Morsella 2008. The unconscious mind. Perspectives in Psychological Science 3(1): 73-79.
|
|
|
Finer, L.B., L.D. Lindberg, S. Singh and C. Stokes-Prindle 2007. Unpublished report to expert panel on pregnancy wantedness. Washington, DC, 10 May.
|
|
|
Gollwitzer, P.M. and J.A. Bargh 2005. Automaticity in goal pursuit. In Handbook of competence and motivation, ed. A. Elliot and C. Dwek, 624-646. New York: Guillford Press.
|
|
|
McQuillan, J., A.L. Greil and K.M. Shreffler 2011. Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way. Maternal and Child Health Journal 15(2): 178-187.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 1979. Psychosocial aspects of contraception. In Contraception: science, technology, and application, ed. National Research Council, 269-287. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 1986. Proception: an important fertility behavior. Demography 23(1): 579-594.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 1994. Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: a theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs 120(2): 223-258.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 1995. Childbearing motivation and its measurement. Journal of Biosocial Science 27: 473-485.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 2003. The role of nurturant schemas in human reproduction. In The biodemography of fertility, ed. J.L. Rodgers and H.-P. Kohler, 43-55. Boston: Kluwer.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 2007. Fertility intentions, counterintentions, and subintentions: a theoretical framework and graphic model www.tfri.org//_TFRI.org_/TFRI_Unpublished_Work.html
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. 2011. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research, and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol. 9:75-98.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1993. Motivational and nonmotivational determinants of child-number desires. Population and Environment 15(2): 113-138.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1995. Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(6): 530-555.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1996a. Patterns of proceptive behavior in a non-clinical sample of married couples. www.tfri.org//_TFRI.org_/TFRI_Unpublished_Work.html
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1996b. Couple disagreement: effects on the formation and implementation of fertility decisions. Personal Relationships 3: 307-336.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1996c. The relative influence of husbands and wives on the choice and use of oral contraception, a diaphragm, and condoms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26: 1749-1774.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B. and J.L. Rodgers 2001. The ontogeny of human bonding systems. Boston: Kluwer.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B., D.J. and Pasta 2002. The motivational substrate of unintended and unwanted pregnancy. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 7(1): 1-29.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B., J.S. Barber and H.H. Gatney 2011. Ambivalent fertility desires: effects on pregnancy risk in young women. Under review.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B., L.J. Severy and D.J. Pasta 2004. A framework for modeling fertility motivation in the dyad. Population Studies 58(2): 193-205.
|
|
|
Miller, W.B., M. Trent, and S. Chung 2011. Ambivalent childbearing motivation and condom use in young urban women. Presented at the Psychosocial Workshop, Washington, DC, 29-30 March 2011. www.tfri.org//_TFRI.org_/TFRI_Unpublished_Work.html
|
|
|
Philipov, D., O. Thévenon, J. Klobas, L. Bernardi, and A.C. Liefbroer 2009. Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO): a state of the art review. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/edrp_1_09.pdf
|
|
|
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G. 2011. Empathic processing: its cognitive and affective dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. In The social neuroscience of empathy, ed. J. Decety and
|
|
|
Vienna Institute of Demography 2010. From intentions to behavior: reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/in2b/
|
|
|
W. Ickes, 215-232. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books. Sutton, S., D. McVey and A. Glanz 1999. A comparative test of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of condom use intentions in a national sample of English young people. Health Psychology 18(10): 72-81.
|
Inhaltsverzeichnisse und Leseproben sind frei zugänglich. Tables of Contents and Reading examples are freely accessible.
Home
